[DoctaPeppa] What's a rulebreaker?

Log Out | Topics | Search Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Author Message Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 597 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Wednesday, October 18, 2006 - 3:34 am:        This is a CA rulebreaker. Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 2 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Thursday, October 19, 2006 - 1:45 am:        Do you believe it would be possible to build up a library of standard boring rulebreaker questions which would be of any use generally and independently of the cultural environment in which the rulebreaker riddle was invented and posed? Did the quick brown fox jump over the lazy dog? a? b? c? d? e? f? g? h? And similarly for the rest? aa? aaa? aaaa? aaaaa? Would I see any pattern if I continued, for eternity, this row of questions consisting of one or more 'a's??? ab? ba? ca? ac? One? Two step? Three little pigs? Four times Al Gore? Five stupid irrelevant unimaginative words? Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd) New member Username: Judgedeadd Post Number: 282 Registered: 9-2006 Posted on Thursday, October 19, 2006 - 8:56 am:        Ni? Peng? Ni-Wom? Ecky, Ecky, Ecky, Ecky, P'tang, Zoo Boing! Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 598 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Sunday, October 22, 2006 - 6:08 pm:        Mani (Mani): Do you believe it would be possible to build up a library of standard boring rulebreaker questions which would be of any use generally and independently of the cultural environment in which the rulebreaker riddle was invented and posed? Absolutely Did the quick brown fox jump over the lazy dog? I don't know, but I've been told. a? No b? No c? No d? No e? No f? No g? No h? No And similarly for the rest? No aa? No aaa? No aaaa? No aaaaa? No Would I see any pattern if I continued, for eternity, this row of questions consisting of one or more 'a's??? No ab? No ba? No ca? No ac? No One? No Two step? Noish Three little pigs? No Four times Al Gore? No Five stupid irrelevant unimaginative words? No Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd): Ni? No Peng? No Ni-Wom? No Ecky, Ecky, Ecky, Ecky, P'tang, Zoo Boing! Noish Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? FA Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd) New member Username: Judgedeadd Post Number: 299 Registered: 9-2006 Posted on Sunday, October 22, 2006 - 6:35 pm:        12345? Aaaaargh? Booznik? Ga, ga, ga, ga, ga? Ma'Ra? Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 600 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Sunday, October 22, 2006 - 10:23 pm:        Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd): 12345? No Aaaaargh? No Booznik? No Ga, ga, ga, ga, ga? No Ma'Ra? No Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 58 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Monday, October 23, 2006 - 1:52 pm:        Is it possible to answer a question consisting of zero words or letters? ? ? ? "Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? FA" FA isn't the same as CA, right? How about this question, then? Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd) New member Username: Judgedeadd Post Number: 310 Registered: 9-2006 Posted on Monday, October 23, 2006 - 1:59 pm:        Step? The step? A step? This step? Nice step? Ste? Two? Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 603 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Tuesday, October 24, 2006 - 5:02 am:        Mani (Mani): Is it possible to answer a question consisting of zero words or letters? I think you know the answer to that ? Hi! ? Hola ? Aloha "Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? FA" FA isn't the same as CA, right? Absolutely right! FA is a false assumption, whereas the latter would be in the case in which it would not be possible for me to answer. How about this question, then? Yope Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd): Step? Nope The step? Not quite A step? Nope This step? Nope Nice step? Nope Ste? Nope Two? Nope Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd) New member Username: Judgedeadd Post Number: 313 Registered: 9-2006 Posted on Tuesday, October 24, 2006 - 6:30 am:        The? Then? Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 605 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Wednesday, October 25, 2006 - 2:04 am:        Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd): The? Nope Then? Absolutely not! Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd) New member Username: Judgedeadd Post Number: 325 Registered: 9-2006 Posted on Wednesday, October 25, 2006 - 7:18 am:        An? A? Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 607 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Wednesday, October 25, 2006 - 11:31 pm:        An? No A? No Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd) New member Username: Judgedeadd Post Number: 348 Registered: 9-2006 Posted on Thursday, October 26, 2006 - 10:36 am:        Zoo? Az? Za? Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 608 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Saturday, October 28, 2006 - 5:12 am:        Zoo? No Az? No Za? No Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig) New member Username: Crazypalpig Post Number: 409 Registered: 8-2006 Posted on Tuesday, October 31, 2006 - 12:27 am:        ! ! ! : : : . . . , , , I think only punctuation can be answered. Correct? Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 609 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Wednesday, November 01, 2006 - 10:16 pm:        ! No ! No ! No : No : No : No . No . No . No , No , No , No I think only punctuation can be answered. Correct? No Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig) New member Username: Crazypalpig Post Number: 415 Registered: 8-2006 Posted on Thursday, November 02, 2006 - 1:33 pm:        ???? ??? ?? ? Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig) New member Username: Crazypalpig Post Number: 416 Registered: 8-2006 Posted on Thursday, November 02, 2006 - 1:35 pm:        supercalifragilisticexpialadocious? Lzeiters (Lzeiters) New member Username: Lzeiters Post Number: 865 Registered: 6-2005 Posted on Thursday, November 02, 2006 - 6:12 pm:        was this puzzle created disestablishmentarianistically? Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig) New member Username: Crazypalpig Post Number: 427 Registered: 8-2006 Posted on Saturday, November 04, 2006 - 9:36 pm:        PNEUMONOULTRAMICROSCOPICSILICOVOLCANOCONIOSIS??? (Ha, Lzeiters, I beat you) Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 610 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Sunday, November 05, 2006 - 4:54 am:        Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig): ???? Yes ??? No ?? Yope ? <b>y=ax^2+bx+c/<b> supercalifragilisticexpialadocious? That's crazy. Lzeiters (Lzeiters): was this puzzle created disestablishmentarianistically? Interestingly enough, it was. Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig): PNEUMONOULTRAMICROSCOPICSILICOVOLCANOCONIOSIS??? Absolutely! Yes! (Ha, Lzeiters, I beat you) Oh yeah, you did! Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig) New member Username: Crazypalpig Post Number: 428 Registered: 8-2006 Posted on Tuesday, November 07, 2006 - 12:54 am:        long word Anything for this one? Or even this one? Sherluck_hums (Sherluck_hums) New member Username: Sherluck_hums Post Number: 152 Registered: 8-2006 Posted on Wednesday, November 08, 2006 - 1:05 pm:        ACETYL SERYL TYROSYL SERYL ISO LEUCYL THREONYL SERYL PROLYL­SERYL GLUTAMINYL PHENYL ALANYL VALYL PHENYL ALANYL LEUCYL SERYL­SERYL VALYL TRYPTOPHYL ALANYL ASPARTYL PROLYL ISOLEUCYL GLUTAMYL­LEUCYL LEUCYL ASPARAGINYL VALYL CYSTEINYL THREONYL SERYL SERYL­LEUCYL GLYCYL ASPARAGINYL GLUTAMINYL PHENYL ALANYL GLUTAMINYL­THREONYL GLUTAMINYL GLUTAMINYL ALANYL ARGINYL THREONYL THREONYL­GLUTAMINYL VALYL GLUTAMINYL GLUTAMINYL PHENYL ALANYL SERYL­GLUTAMINYL VALYL TRYPTOPHYL LYSYL PROLYL PHENYL ALANYL PROLYL­GLUTAMINYL SERYL THREONYL VALYL ARGINYL PHENYL ALANYL PROLYL­GLYCYL ASPARTYL VALYL TYROSYL LYSYL VALYL TYROSYL ARGINYL TYROSYL­ASPARAGINYL ALANYL VALYL LEUCYL ASPARTYL PROLYL LEUCYL ISOLEUCYL­THREONYL ALANYL LEUCYL LEUCYL GLYCYL THREONYL PHENYL ALANYL­ASPARTYL THREONYL ARGINYL ASPARAGINYL ARGINYL ISOLEUCYL ISOLEUCYL­GLUTAMYL VALYL GLUTAMYL ASPARAGINYL GLUTAMINYL GLUTAMINYL SERYL­PROLYL THREONYL THREONYL ALANYL GLUTAMYL THREONYL LEUCYL­ASPARTYL ALANYL THREONYL ARGINYL ARGINYL VALYL ASPARTYL ASPARTYL­ALANYL THREONYL VALYL ALANYL ISOLEUCYL ARGINYL SERYL ALANYL­ASPARAGINYL ISOLEUCYL ASPARAGINYL LEUCYL VALYL ASPARAGINYL­GLUTAMYL LEUCYL VALYL ARGINYL GLYCYL THREONYL GLYCYL LEUCYL­TYROSYL ASPARAGINYL GLUTAMINYL ASPARAGINYL THREONYL PHENYL­ALANYL GLUTAMYL SERYL METHIONYL SERYL GLYCYL LEUCYL VALYL­TRYPTOPHYL THREONYL SERYL ALANYL PROLYL ALANYL SERINE? LOL I beat you PalPig! Sherluck_hums (Sherluck_hums) New member Username: Sherluck_hums Post Number: 153 Registered: 8-2006 Posted on Wednesday, November 08, 2006 - 1:14 pm:        Well maybe not with this one but this next one will. Lol it's a swedish word :P NORDÖSTERSJÖKUSTARTILLERIFLYGSPANINGSSIMULATORANLÄGG- NINGSMATERIELUNDERHÅLLSUPPFÖLJNINGSSYSTEMDISKUSSIONS- INLÄGGSFÖRBEREDELSEARBETEN. Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 611 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Friday, November 10, 2006 - 5:23 am:        Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig): long word No Anything for this one? Yes Or even this one? Maybe Sherluck_hums (Sherluck_hums): ACETYL Yes SERYL Yes TYROSYL Yes SERYL Yes ISO Yes LEUCYL Yes THREONYL Yes SERYL Yes PROLYL­SERYL Yes GLUTAMINYL Yes PHENYL Yope ALANYL Four VALYL score PHENYL and ALANYL seven LEUCYL years SERYL­SERYL ago VALYL our TRYPTOPHYL fathers ALANYL brought ASPARTYL forth PROLYL on ISOLEUCYL this GLUTAMYL­LEUCYL continent LEUCYL a ASPARAGINYL new VALYL nation CYSTEINYL Yes THREONYL Yes SERYL Yes SERYL­LEUCYL Yes GLYCYL We ASPARAGINYL the GLUTAMINYL people PHENYL of ALANYL the GLUTAMINYL­THREONYL United GLUTAMINYL States, GLUTAMINYL in ALANYL order ARGINYL to THREONYL form THREONYL­ a GLUTAMINYL more VALYL perfect GLUTAMINYL union, GLUTAMINYL establish PHENYL justice, ALANYL ensure SERYL­GLUTAMINYL domestic VALYL tranquility, TRYPTOPHYL provide LYSYL for PROLYL the PHENYL common ALANYL defense, PROLYL­GLUTAMINYL promote SERYL the THREONYL general VALYL welfare, ARGINYL and PHENYL secure ALANYL the PROLYL­GLYCYL blessings ASPARTYL of VALYL liberty TYROSYL to LYSYL ourselves VALYL and TYROSYL our ARGINYL posterity TYROSYL­ASPARAGINYL do ALANYL ordain VALYL and LEUCYL establish ASPARTYL this PROLYL Constitution LEUCYL of ISOLEUCYL­THREONYL the ALANYL United LEUCYL States LEUCYL of GLYCYL America. THREONYL Yes PHENYL ALANYL­ASPARTYL No THREONYL No ARGINYL No ASPARAGINYL No ARGINYL No ISOLEUCYL No ISOLEUCYL­GLUTAMYL No VALYL No GLUTAMYL No ASPARAGINYL No GLUTAMINYL No GLUTAMINYL No SERYL­PROLYL No THREONYL No THREONYL No ALANYL No GLUTAMYL No THREONYL No LEUCYL­ASPARTYL No ALANYL No THREONYL No ARGINYL No ARGINYL No VALYL No ASPARTYL No ASPARTYL­ALANYL No THREONYL No VALYL No ALANYL No ISOLEUCYL No ARGINYL No SERYL No ALANYL­ASPARAGINYL No ISOLEUCYL No ASPARAGINYL No LEUCYL No VALYL No ASPARAGINYL­GLUTAMYL No LEUCYL No VALYL No ARGINYL No GLYCYL No THREONYL No GLYCYL No LEUCYL­TYROSYL No ASPARAGINYL No GLUTAMINYL No ASPARAGINYL No THREONYL No PHENYL­ALANYL No GLUTAMYL No SERYL No METHIONYL No SERYL No GLYCYL No LEUCYL No VALYL­TRYPTOPHYL No THREONYL No SERYL No ALANYL No PROLYL No ALANYL No SERINE? No LOL I beat you PalPig! OK Well maybe not with this one but this next one will. Lol it's a swedish word :P NORDÖSTERSJÖKUSTARTILLERIFLYGSPANINGSSIMULATORANLÄGG- NINGSMATERIELUNDERHÅLLSUPPFÖLJNINGSSYSTEMDISKUSSIONS- INLÄGGSFÖRBEREDELSEARBETEN. Happy birthday! Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig) New member Username: Crazypalpig Post Number: 450 Registered: 8-2006 Posted on Saturday, November 11, 2006 - 6:59 pm:        sarah sip soggy sat sit sot set say soo-eY! Sag Sap sorry Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 612 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Sunday, November 12, 2006 - 3:25 am:        Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig): sarah No sip No soggy No sat No sit No sot No set No say No soo-eY! No Sag No Sap No sorry No Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig) New member Username: Crazypalpig Post Number: 452 Registered: 8-2006 Posted on Thursday, November 16, 2006 - 1:02 am:        ARG!!! seee Plaaannnttt? Ssstttrrreeettt? aa? ab? ac? ad? ae? and so forth Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig) New member Username: Crazypalpig Post Number: 453 Registered: 8-2006 Posted on Thursday, November 16, 2006 - 1:03 am:        any particular reason why u answered 2 yes on the first seyrl and no on the second? Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 613 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Thursday, November 23, 2006 - 4:20 am:        Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig): ARG!!! Not even close seee Yes, this can be answered Plaaannnttt? No, this is not something that cannot be answered. Ssstttrrreeettt? 42 aa? 42 ab? 42 ac? 42 ad? 42 ae? 42 and so forth 42 any particular reason why u answered 2 yes on the first seyrl and no on the second? You mean other than because I'm a gangster and I do what I want? No. Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 190 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Friday, November 24, 2006 - 8:01 pm:        Two stop? Stop? Stop! Taa step? taa step? tab step? tac step? tad step? taf step? tag step? tah step? tai step? taj step? tak step? tal step? tam step? tan step? tao step? tap step? Now stop? Now stop! ??????????????????????????? ?? ???? ?????? ???????? ?????????? ???????????? The end? Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 191 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Friday, November 24, 2006 - 8:08 pm:        What's a rulebreaker? I'll tell you what a rulebreaker is: it's a stupid very unlateral and stupid kind of puzzle! I hereby ask you, disestablishmentarianistically: would you please stop it, now? (No hard feelings... I'm hosting a rule breaker myself, you know... I'm just trying to find out whether asking a disestablishmentarianistic question would bring me closer to the answer... ) Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 614 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Sunday, November 26, 2006 - 11:08 pm:        Mani (Mani): Two stop? This can be answered. Stop? This can be answered. Stop! This can be answered. Taa step? This can be answered. taa step? This can be answered. tab step? This can be answered. tac step? This can be answered. tad step? This can be answered. taf step? This can be answered. tag step? This can be answered. tah step? This can be answered. tai step? This can be answered. taj step? This can be answered. tak step? This can be answered. tal step? This can be answered. tam step? This can be answered. tan step? This can be answered. tao step? This can be answered. tap step? This can be answered. Now stop? This can be answered. Now stop! This can be answered. ??????????????????????????? This can be answered. ?? This can be answered. ???? This can be answered. ?????? This can be answered. ???????? This can be answered. ?????????? This can be answered. ???????????? This can be answered. The end? This can be answered. What's a rulebreaker? This can be answered. I'll tell you what a rulebreaker is: it's a stupid very unlateral and stupid kind of puzzle! This can be answered. I hereby ask you, disestablishmentarianistically: would you please stop it, now? This can be answered. (No hard feelings... I'm hosting a rule breaker myself, you know... I'm just trying to find out whether asking a disestablishmentarianistic question would bring me closer to the answer... ) ...and we have come to find that it just takes you further away... Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 615 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Sunday, November 26, 2006 - 11:19 pm:        Hint: Italics can be an obstacle in the demolition derby of life. Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig) New member Username: Crazypalpig Post Number: 484 Registered: 8-2006 Posted on Monday, November 27, 2006 - 2:30 pm:        nnnnn? nnnnnn? zzzzz? Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 206 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Monday, November 27, 2006 - 9:54 pm:        icbaoitddol? Itcabeanobinthdedeofli? ioddl? Yoddle? High on a hill was a lonely goatherd? Lay ee odl lay ee odl lay hee hoo? Loud was the voice of the lonely goatherd? Lay ee odl lay ee odl-oo? Italics? Italia, Italia, Italia, Italia. Romanes eunt domus? Romane ite domum? Italics can be an obstacle in the demolition derby of life? Italics? can? be? an? obstacle? in? the? demolition? derby? of? life? Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 616 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Thursday, November 30, 2006 - 9:18 pm:        Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig): nnnnn? Yep nnnnnn? Yep zzzzz? Yep Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig): icbaoitddol? Yep Itcabeanobinthdedeofli? Yep ioddl? Yep Yoddle? Yep High on a hill was a lonely goatherd? Yep Lay ee odl lay ee odl lay hee hoo? Yep Loud was the voice of the lonely goatherd? Yep Lay ee odl lay ee odl-oo? Yep Italics? Yep Italia, Italia, Italia, Italia. Yep Romanes eunt domus? Yep Romane ite domum? Yep Italics can be an obstacle in the demolition derby of life? Yep Italics? Yep can? Yep be? Yep an? Yep obstacle? Yep in? Yep the? Yep demolition? Yep derby? Yep of? Yep life? Yep If italics can be an obstacle, why are you still using them? Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 211 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Friday, December 01, 2006 - 11:56 am:        Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? kaza-phoo-dayl-ibangarahz-deputy? Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 212 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Friday, December 01, 2006 - 11:58 am:        I use them because I like them, that's why. Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 617 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Saturday, December 02, 2006 - 2:04 am:        Mani (Mani): Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? Yes Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? Yes Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? Yes Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? Yes Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? Yes Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? Yes Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? Yes Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? Yes Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv? Yes kaza-phoo-dayl-ibangarahz-deputy? Yes I use them because I like them, that's why. That's your answer for everything! It was a rhetorical question???? Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig) New member Username: Crazypalpig Post Number: 512 Registered: 8-2006 Posted on Monday, December 04, 2006 - 3:24 pm:        Is the rule a no rule, I will do as I please? Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 618 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Friday, December 08, 2006 - 1:39 am:        Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig): Is the rule a no rule, I will do as I please? No Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig) New member Username: Crazypalpig Post Number: 536 Registered: 8-2006 Posted on Thursday, December 14, 2006 - 2:55 pm:        ddd aaa nnn ggg eee rrr Cookie (Cookie) New member Username: Cookie Post Number: 185 Registered: 10-2003 Posted on Friday, December 15, 2006 - 10:03 am:        CA = correct assumption? Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 619 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Friday, December 15, 2006 - 11:41 pm:        Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig): ddd Still far off. aaa Still far off. nnn Still far off. ggg Still far off. eee Still far off. rrr Still far off. CA = correct assumption? Finally, this is going somewhere! The answer is no. For this puzzle, CA = find what I Cannot Answer. Shouldn't be long now... Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 620 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Friday, December 15, 2006 - 11:43 pm:        Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig): ddd Still far off. aaa Still far off. nnn Still far off. ggg Still far off. eee Still far off. rrr Still far off. Cookie (Cookie): CA = correct assumption? Finally, this is going somewhere! The answer is no. For this puzzle, CA = find what I Cannot Answer. Shouldn't be long now... Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig) New member Username: Crazypalpig Post Number: 570 Registered: 8-2006 Posted on Tuesday, January 02, 2007 - 9:11 pm:        Hmmm I just realized that you have not answered CA to any of them!! One question:are you no's the equivalents of CA? OK! Put CA here now! That's an ORDER! Pretty plz with a cherry on top! Snoozer (Snoozer) New member Username: Snoozer Post Number: 57 Registered: 1-2007 Posted on Thursday, January 04, 2007 - 9:00 pm:        What is the solution? Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 627 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Friday, January 05, 2007 - 3:14 am:        Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig): Hmmm I just realized that you have not answered CA to any of them!! One question:are you no's the equivalents of CA? no OK! Put CA here now! That's an ORDER! Pretty plz with a cherry on top! Snoozer (Snoozer): What is the solution? Stop cheating! :-] Snoozer (Snoozer) New member Username: Snoozer Post Number: 77 Registered: 1-2007 Posted on Friday, January 05, 2007 - 1:04 pm:        Sorry... Did I break a rule? Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig) New member Username: Crazypalpig Post Number: 577 Registered: 8-2006 Posted on Friday, January 05, 2007 - 3:00 pm:        Hey, can you plz actually answer mine? Plz? Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 628 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Friday, January 05, 2007 - 6:04 pm:        Snoozer (Snoozer): Sorry... Did I break a rule? Of course not. Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig): Hey, can you plz actually answer mine? Plz? Answer your what? I did not see any question. Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig) New member Username: Crazypalpig Post Number: 581 Registered: 8-2006 Posted on Sunday, January 07, 2007 - 12:54 am:        My questions :these K! Put CA here now! That's an ORDER! Pretty plz with a cherry on top! Snoozer (Snoozer) New member Username: Snoozer Post Number: 124 Registered: 1-2007 Posted on Monday, January 08, 2007 - 4:26 pm:        Who are you? What are you? Where are you from? What are you doing? Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig) New member Username: Crazypalpig Post Number: 584 Registered: 8-2006 Posted on Monday, January 08, 2007 - 11:39 pm:        Is the content of our post relevant? Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 255 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 4:18 pm:        OK, here's one theory, which I will now put to test. Perhaps there will not be any CA's before there have been some number of posts without italics in them. I will now post 15 posts without italics. Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 256 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 4:18 pm:        lalala Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 257 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 4:19 pm:        hello? Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 258 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 4:19 pm:        sediment Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 259 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 4:20 pm:        this Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 260 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 4:20 pm:        is? Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 261 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 4:21 pm:        getting? Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 262 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 4:21 pm:        a? Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 263 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 4:22 pm:        bit? Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 264 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 4:23 pm:        tedious? and? boring? Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 265 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 4:23 pm:        i.e.? Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 266 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 4:24 pm:        this? Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 267 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 4:24 pm:        process Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 268 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 4:25 pm:        of Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 269 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 4:27 pm:        creating and posting? 15 posts, I mean, having to write? my password? again and again each time? etcetera. Maybe my idea is right, but the limit is at 50 posts...? I'll try that tomorrow... <ominous> Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig) New member Username: Crazypalpig Post Number: 587 Registered: 8-2006 Posted on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 10:49 pm:        Well, that was nuts! Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 629 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Monday, January 15, 2007 - 7:13 pm:        Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig): My questions :these K! Yes Put CA here now! No That's an ORDER! I said no! Pretty plz with a cherry on top! No! Snoozer (Snoozer): Who are you? No What are you? No Where are you from? No What are you doing? No Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig): Is the content of our post relevant? Yes Mani (Mani): OK, here's one theory, which I will now put to test. Perhaps there will not be any CA's before there have been some number of posts without italics in them. I will now post 15 posts without italics. I will spare you your trouble by telling you that it will do no good. lalala hello? No sediment this is? No getting? No a? No bit? No tedious? No and? No boring? No i.e.? No this? No process of creating and posting? CA 15 posts, I mean, having to write? CA my password? No again and again each time? No etcetera. Maybe my idea is right, but the limit is at 50 posts...? No I'll try that tomorrow... <ominous> Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig): Well, that was nuts! Yes Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 271 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Monday, January 15, 2007 - 7:58 pm:        Well, it did something good... We got two CA's! Repeatability is the motherstone of experimental scientific evidence. Or something like that. Hence? we will try to repeat the critical stuff? and see if the result remains the same. creating and posting? creating and posting? creating and posting? having to write? creating and posting? having to write? having to write? Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 630 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Tuesday, January 16, 2007 - 7:32 am:        Mani (Mani): Well, it did something good... We got two CA's! Repeatability is the motherstone of experimental scientific evidence. Or something like that. Hence? Yes we will try to repeat the critical stuff? Yes and see if the result remains the same. creating and posting? cannot be determined from information given creating and posting? cannot be determined from information given creating and posting? cannot be determined from information given having to write? CA-ish creating and posting? cannot be determined from information given having to write? CA-ish having to write? CA-ish To get a CA, you need the entire linguistic element! Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 272 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Tuesday, January 16, 2007 - 8:44 am:        process of creating and posting? process of creating and posting? This is getting a bit tedious and boring, i.e. this process of creating and posting? This is getting a bit tedious and boring, i.e. this process of creating and posting? This is getting a bit tedious and boring, i.e. this process of creating and posting 15 posts, I mean, having to write my password again and again each time? This is getting a bit tedious and boring, i.e. this process of creating and posting 15 posts, I mean, having to write my password again and again each time? Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 273 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Tuesday, January 16, 2007 - 8:46 am:        15 posts, I mean, having to write? 15 posts, I mean, having to write? This is getting a bit tedious and boring, i.e. this process of creating and posting 15 posts, I mean, having to write? This is getting a bit tedious and boring, i.e. this process of creating and posting 15 posts, I mean, having to write? Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 275 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Tuesday, January 16, 2007 - 9:59 am:        Do you know what I'm saying? Shall we keep dreaming? Is your plan working? Is your plan working as expected? What shall we do? What with the drunken sailing? May I, with you, dance? In the middle of the night, does the rule come sneaking? Did you see where the puzzle went? Have I been wanting to write? Should we keep them questions coming? If the Hulk and a samurai meet for a cup of tea, who will win? Should old acquaintance be forgot? Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 631 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 - 3:16 am:        Mani (Mani): process of creating and posting? CA process of creating and posting? CA This is getting a bit tedious and boring, i.e. this process of creating and posting? CA This is getting a bit tedious and boring, i.e. this process of creating and posting? CA This is getting a bit tedious and boring, i.e. this process of creating and posting 15 posts, I mean, having to write my password again and again each time? CA This is getting a bit tedious and boring, i.e. this process of creating and posting 15 posts, I mean, having to write my password again and again each time? CA 15 posts, I mean, having to write? CA 15 posts, I mean, having to write? CA This is getting a bit tedious and boring, i.e. this process of creating and posting 15 posts, I mean, having to write? CA This is getting a bit tedious and boring, i.e. this process of creating and posting 15 posts, I mean, having to write? CA Do you know what I'm saying? No Shall we keep dreaming? If you want Is your plan working? Not really Is your plan working as expected? Nope What shall we do? I don't know What with the drunken sailing? I don't know May I, with you, dance? Sure In the middle of the night, does the rule come sneaking? No Did you see where the puzzle went? No Have I been wanting to write? Only you know that Should we keep them questions coming? Yep If the Hulk and a samurai meet for a cup of tea, who will win? You know that's not a yes or no question Should old acquaintance be forgot? It depends You are on the right track. Just don't derail! Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 277 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 - 4:56 pm:        process of jumping and posting? method of jumping and posting? process in jumping and posting? process in jumping or posting? process of elephant or posting? process of creating and elephant? procedure of building and destroying? process of create and post? process of created and posted? process creating posting? I bite? Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 278 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 - 5:05 pm:        process in creating and posting? process in creating or posting? process of creating or posting? Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 279 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 - 5:08 pm:        I mean, having to write? Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 632 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 - 9:42 pm:        Mani (Mani): process of jumping and posting? CA method of jumping and posting? CA process in jumping and posting? CA process in jumping or posting? CA process of elephant or posting? CA process of creating and elephant? CA procedure of building and destroying? CA process of create and post? Now you are just being silly process of created and posted? No! process creating posting? It cannot be determined whether this can answered. I bite? No process in creating and posting? CA process in creating or posting? CA process of creating or posting? CA I mean, having to write? CA Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig) New member Username: Crazypalpig Post Number: 600 Registered: 8-2006 Posted on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 - 11:11 pm:        I have no clue how you just did that Process Method Prodess Method Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 280 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 - 11:59 pm:        Crazypalpig: neither have I. plan in the making? way of living? talking head? to love? on loving? to write? of writing? xxxxx speaking? xxxxxxxx speaking? x speaking? n speaking? n blablabla speaking? process in jumping? mean having? mean having to write? I mean having? I mean having to? I meat having to write? I met shaving to write? I mean havink to write? I mean having to underwear? I mean having no underwear? having to? process of elephant? process of elessdrhiocasfniopant and posting? Snoozer (Snoozer) New member Username: Snoozer Post Number: 266 Registered: 1-2007 Posted on Thursday, January 18, 2007 - 10:03 pm:        Do you have to answer this post? Well, did you? Sure? This one too? Could you please leave this question unanswered? Could you answer this question with a question? [Line intentionally left blank] Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 633 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Thursday, January 18, 2007 - 10:07 pm:        Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig): I have no clue how you just did that I assume the following are questions, even though they lack question marks. Process No Method No Prodess No Method No Mani (Mani): Crazypalpig: neither have I. plan in the making? CA-ish way of living? CA-ish talking head? No to love? No on loving? cannot be determined to write? No of writing? CA xxxxx speaking? No xxxxxxxx speaking? No x speaking? No n speaking? No n blablabla speaking? No process in jumping? CA-ish mean having? Again, I'm going to say you need the ENTIRE LINGUISTIC ELEMENT! mean having to write? CA-ish I mean having? CA I mean having to? CA-ish I meat having to write? CA-ish I met shaving to write? cbd I mean havink to write? No I mean having to underwear? Please rephrase I mean having no underwear? CA having to? could be a CA process of elephant? NO! process of elessdrhiocasfniopant and posting? CA-ish Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 634 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Thursday, January 18, 2007 - 10:10 pm:        Snoozer (Snoozer): Do you have to answer this post? I don't have to, but I'm sure people would like it. Well, did you? I sure did. Sure? Yep This one too? Yep Could you please leave this question unanswered? I could. Could you answer this question with a question? Yep [Line intentionally left blank] [Answer intentionally missing] Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 281 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Thursday, January 18, 2007 - 11:44 pm:        Perhaps this attempt at getting off 10 CA's in a row will work out? I was running and jumping today, right? The dying man was old, wasn't he? Was there ever a way of playing poker which was totally unhazardous to your economy? Will was trying to concentrate, wasn't he? Is wanting to work worse than having to? Are these events worth knowing of? Did he have a plan in the making? Mani was just figuring out the puzzle's answer, when terror struck, wasn't he? "It is useful to let-lie-before-us and so the taking-to-heart also : beings in being." [(the weird philosopher) Heidegger's translation of Parmenides dictum "One should both say and think that being is."] If I get around 8 or 9 CA's on the above, then I have a guess at the rule. My conception of it is somewhat vague at the moment, but it basically involves the following: Criterium nr I for an unanswerable question: There should be a verb in the progressive tense in it. A thing to note here is that sentences like "What do you do for a living?", "Did you see a blossoming tree?" the words "living" and "blossoming" are used in nounal and adjectival senses, respectively. Hence those sentences don't fulfill Criterium nr I. This difference can be tricky sometimes, though. Criterium nr II for an unanswerable question: Split the question into syntactical parts such as subject, predicate, object, and perhaps somewhat further into various attributes, subclauses etcetera. (Let's call the whatever "undivisible" sentence bits that the sentence gets split into "the basic syntactical chunks".) Then check the verb(s) in progressive tense which you found while testing Criterium I. If it (or, if there are several, then at least one of them) falls into a "basic syntactical chunk" which contains at least one other word apart from the progressive tense verb itself, then Criterium II is fulfilled, and you've got a CA. Have I been wanting to write? Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 635 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Friday, January 19, 2007 - 1:49 am:        Mani (Mani): Perhaps this attempt at getting off 10 CA's in a row will work out? CA I was running and jumping today, right? No The dying man was old, wasn't he? No Was there ever a way of playing poker which was totally unhazardous to your economy? CA Will was trying to concentrate, wasn't he? No, he was just sleeping Is wanting to work worse than having to? CA Are these events worth knowing of? Please rephrase for possible unanswerability (you know you cannot end a sentence with a preposition) Did he have a plan in the making? CA-ish Mani was just figuring out the puzzle's answer, when terror struck, wasn't he? No, he was running "It is useful to let-lie-before-us and so the taking-to-heart also : beings in being." Please rephrase?[(the weird philosopher) Heidegger's translation of Parmenides dictum "One should both say and think that being is."] If I get around 8 or 9 CA's on the above, then I have a guess at the rule. My conception of it is somewhat vague at the moment, but it basically involves the following: Criterium nr I for an unanswerable question: There should be a verb in the progressive tense in it. A thing to note here is that sentences like "What do you do for a living?", "Did you see a blossoming tree?" the words "living" and "blossoming" are used in nounal and adjectival senses, respectively. Hence those sentences don't fulfill Criterium nr I. This difference can be tricky sometimes, though. Criterium nr II for an unanswerable question: Split the question into syntactical parts such as subject, predicate, object, and perhaps somewhat further into various attributes, subclauses etcetera. (Let's call the whatever "undivisible" sentence bits that the sentence gets split into "the basic syntactical chunks".) Then check the verb(s) in progressive tense which you found while testing Criterium I. If it (or, if there are several, then at least one of them) falls into a "basic syntactical chunk" which contains at least one other word apart from the progressive tense verb itself, then Criterium II is fulfilled, and you've got a CA. Have I been wanting to write? How the fizzle should I know? Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig) New member Username: Crazypalpig Post Number: 612 Registered: 8-2006 Posted on Friday, January 26, 2007 - 11:33 pm:        Um... Question: can you really not put a good post on that one, or did you do that on purpose? Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 636 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Saturday, January 27, 2007 - 10:35 pm:        Crazypalpig (Crazypalpig): Um... Question: can you really not put a good post on that one, or did you do that on purpose? I think it is quite obvious what I did. Reread the previous responses if you still don't get it. Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 283 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Sunday, January 28, 2007 - 5:43 am:        What's the point in behaving chevaleresquely, these days? So panhandling the nostril is not an option? There was some heavy petting going on in there, right? So, you say my constant beat-boxing has annoyed you, lately? Has the puzzle been solved, in a manner of speaking? Did our finding out the answer take longer than you expected? Is panicking good for you? And there was much rejoicing, wasn't there? ... and so on. Is the rule simply that those questions which cannot be answered have a, what shall I say, "nounal participle" in them? I don't know if that's the actual grammatical term. I wonder what the hint has to do with all this, though: It Can Be An ODD Life? It Can Be AnOTher DeDerOLi? It Can Be AnOInT Dem Dere OL'? Mani (Mani) New member Username: Mani Post Number: 284 Registered: 10-2006 Posted on Sunday, January 28, 2007 - 5:51 am:        Oh, perhaps it was just a hint from you that my sentence (No hard feelings... I'm hosting a rule breaker myself, you know... I'm just trying to find out whether asking a disestablishmentarianistic question would bring me closer to the answer... ) (which was asked in italics) would have gotten a CA if it hadn't been in italics (due to the nounal phrase "asking a disestablishmentarianistic question") Doctapeppa (Doctapeppa) New member Username: Doctapeppa Post Number: 637 Registered: 12-2004 Posted on Monday, January 29, 2007 - 2:43 am:        Mani (Mani): What's the point in behaving chevaleresquely, these days? CA So panhandling the nostril is not an option? CA There was some heavy petting going on in there, right? CA So, you say my constant beat-boxing has annoyed you, lately? CA Has the puzzle been solved, in a manner of speaking? CA Did our finding out the answer take longer than you expected? CA Is panicking good for you? CA And there was much rejoicing, wasn't there? CA ... and so on. Is the rule simply that those questions which cannot be answered have a, what shall I say, "nounal participle" in them? Sure I don't know if that's the actual grammatical term. I wonder what the hint has to do with all this, though: It Can Be An ODD Life? It Can Be AnOTher DeDerOLi? It Can Be AnOInT Dem Dere OL'? Oh, perhaps it was just a hint from you that my sentence (No hard feelings... I'm hosting a rule breaker myself, you know... I'm just trying to find out whether asking a disestablishmentarianistic question would bring me closer to the answer... ) (which was asked in italics) would have gotten a CA if it hadn't been in italics (due to the nounal phrase "asking a disestablishmentarianistic question") Probably this, but you'll never know for sure. OK, I think this is good enough for a ***********************SPOILER*************************** I answer questions with the most appropriate yes-or-no-style answer, except in one case: I cannot answer questions that have "easily discernible" "-ing" gerunds (In linguistics, a gerund is a kind of verbal noun that exists in some languages. In today's English, it can behave as a verb within a clause (so that, for example, it may be modified by an adverb or have an object), but the clause as a whole (sometimes consisting only of one word, the gerund) acts as a noun within the larger sentence).