| Author |
Message |
Torquemada (Torquemada)
New member Username: Torquemada
Post Number: 88 Registered: 1-2010
| | Posted on Tuesday, February 09, 2010 - 4:21 pm: |      |
The children disappeared overnight. There was little doubt that a crime had been committed, but the police made no attempt to find them. Early spoilers by email, please |
Galfisk (Galfisk)
New member Username: Galfisk
Post Number: 1259 Registered: 9-2009
| | Posted on Tuesday, February 09, 2010 - 5:40 pm: |      |
Human children? Real live children? Did the police have a good reason not to attempt finding them? Are the children alive? Were they alive when they disappeared? Were they in one location when they disappeared? Relevant where? Relevant how many children? Their age relevant? Their relation? Did something disappear besides the children? |
Torquemada (Torquemada)
New member Username: Torquemada
Post Number: 92 Registered: 1-2010
| | Posted on Tuesday, February 09, 2010 - 8:56 pm: |      |
Human children? Yes Real live children? Yesish Did the police have a good reason not to attempt finding them? Yes Are the children alive? Yope Were they alive when they disappeared? Yesish Were they in one location when they disappeared? For svv of location Relevant where? Yesish Relevant how many children? No, but knowing how many might give you a clue Their age relevant? No Their relation? Do you mean their relationship to each other? If so, no Did something disappear besides the children? Not that I know of |
Alhucema (Alhucema)
New member Username: Alhucema
Post Number: 1751 Registered: 11-2008
| | Posted on Tuesday, February 09, 2010 - 9:05 pm: |      |
Was the crime committed by the children? Were they its victims? |
Torquemada (Torquemada)
New member Username: Torquemada
Post Number: 93 Registered: 1-2010
| | Posted on Tuesday, February 09, 2010 - 10:43 pm: |      |
Was the crime committed by the children? Were they its victims? Neither of these |
Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo
Post Number: 2303 Registered: 5-2003
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 10, 2010 - 2:00 am: |      |
Were the children harmed? Found? Brought back? Is it relevant who took them? Is this crime considered to be kidnapping, or something else? |
Torquemada (Torquemada)
New member Username: Torquemada
Post Number: 95 Registered: 1-2010
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 10, 2010 - 8:43 am: |      |
Were the children harmed? No Found? Some were, over time, but to avoid misleading too much, I'll just say no Brought back? No, and there's probably a FA here Is it relevant who took them? Definite FA Is this crime considered to be kidnapping, or something else? Something else, undoubtedly |
Alhucema (Alhucema)
New member Username: Alhucema
Post Number: 1753 Registered: 11-2008
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 10, 2010 - 9:34 am: |      |
The "yesish" answers about the children - the children who disappeared weren't live children of flesh and bone, correct? Did some representations/images of children disappear? |
Torquemada (Torquemada)
New member Username: Torquemada
Post Number: 96 Registered: 1-2010
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 10, 2010 - 10:29 am: |      |
******BLOOPER****** The answers to "Real live children?" and "Were they alive when they disappeared?" should more accurately be "Yope" The "yesish" answers about the children - the children who disappeared weren't live children of flesh and bone, correct? This is a difficult one to answer. Yesish to yope. Did some representations/images of children disappear? Noish Sorry for all the unhelpful answers. It's a complicated situation, and I daren't go into too much detail in case I $p01l the puzzle for you. |
Alhucema (Alhucema)
New member Username: Alhucema
Post Number: 1758 Registered: 11-2008
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 10, 2010 - 1:21 pm: |      |
Umm, this is getting really tricky... Location and time relevant? WWII relevant? |
Torquemada (Torquemada)
New member Username: Torquemada
Post Number: 99 Registered: 1-2010
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 10, 2010 - 2:24 pm: |      |
Umm, this is getting really tricky... Sorry! Hopefully, this will help. Location and time relevant? Time is relevant, and location for the same svv of location as above WWII relevant? But not this HINT: Apart from determining the location, time and number of disappearances, it might be useful in making sense of my answers to ask more "lateral" questions |
Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo
Post Number: 2312 Registered: 5-2003
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 10, 2010 - 2:32 pm: |      |
Are the children embryos? |
Torquemada (Torquemada)
New member Username: Torquemada
Post Number: 100 Registered: 1-2010
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 10, 2010 - 3:43 pm: |      |
Are the children embryos? No. Representations was OTRT |
Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo
Post Number: 2318 Registered: 5-2003
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 10, 2010 - 3:48 pm: |      |
Are they artwork? |
Torquemada (Torquemada)
New member Username: Torquemada
Post Number: 101 Registered: 1-2010
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 10, 2010 - 4:32 pm: |      |
Are they artwork? No |
Hominid (Hominid)
New member Username: Hominid
Post Number: 154 Registered: 1-2010
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 10, 2010 - 10:35 pm: |      |
Time: BC? 1st millenium? 2nd millenium? 3rd millenium |
Alhucema (Alhucema)
New member Username: Alhucema
Post Number: 1766 Registered: 11-2008
| | Posted on Friday, February 12, 2010 - 9:57 am: |      |
Real event? Science-fiction? FYOI? |
Torquemada (Torquemada)
New member Username: Torquemada
Post Number: 102 Registered: 1-2010
| | Posted on Monday, February 15, 2010 - 12:58 pm: |      |
Time: BC? 1st millenium? 2nd millenium? 3rd millenium It happened in 1987 Real event? This Science-fiction? FYOI? HINT: The total number of children who disappeared was around 7m, all from a single country. |
Gourami (Gourami)
Moderator Username: Gourami
Post Number: 947 Registered: 10-2008
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 17, 2010 - 2:28 pm: |      |
Was what disappeared the physical bodies of young human beings? Were they dead? Did the bodies remain, but some aspect of the child disappeared? Some part of the body? The mind? The soul? Did a single person commit this crime? Did an organization? The government? Was it accidental? Was their guilt known? Were they punished? |
Torquemada (Torquemada)
New member Username: Torquemada
Post Number: 120 Registered: 1-2010
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 17, 2010 - 3:09 pm: |      |
Was what disappeared the physical bodies of young human beings? No Were they dead? Yope Did the bodies remain, Yope but some aspect of the child disappeared? Yesish. This is OTRT. Some part of the body? The mind? The soul? None of these. And I should add that no children were harmed in the making of this puzzle. Did a single person commit this crime? Did an organization? Many people committed the crime, but not as part of an organisation. The government? Definitely not! Was it accidental? No Was their guilt known? Individually, no, or at least not conclusively without further investigation. Collectively, yes. A crime had clearly been committed. Were they punished? I've been unable to find any evidence that they were. A few were probably identified and punished, pour encourager les autres, but a drop in the ocean when considered against the scale of the crime. |
Gourami (Gourami)
Moderator Username: Gourami
Post Number: 956 Registered: 10-2008
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 17, 2010 - 7:30 pm: |      |
Could you call the crime robbery? Vandalism? Was it a violent act? I see you said that the children were not the victims; could one say that there were victims? Would the crime be committed by any of the people for a material profit? Out of necessity? To avoid some kind of loss? Are documents relevant? The children's names? Was it the case that the children were still around, but not where they should be? |
Torquemada (Torquemada)
New member Username: Torquemada
Post Number: 128 Registered: 1-2010
| | Posted on Thursday, February 18, 2010 - 9:11 am: |      |
Could you call the crime robbery? You could, although I'd use a different word Vandalism? No Was it a violent act? Definitely not I see you said that the children were not the victims; could one say that there were victims? Yes, but beware a FA Would the crime be committed by any of the people for a material profit? Definitely Out of necessity? Possibly, in some cases, but that's not likely to help you To avoid some kind of loss? Yes, for svv of loss Are documents relevant? Yes! The children's names? Yesish Was it the case that the children were still around, but not where they should be? DOYD. Let's just say that no children physically moved. |
Peter365 (Peter365)
New member Username: Peter365
Post Number: 2483 Registered: 1-2007
| | Posted on Thursday, February 18, 2010 - 1:30 pm: |      |
Could it be that the children lost their childhood innocence and therefore we no longer childlike? We're they pressed into doing something like forced labour or prostitution? anything to do with Child soldiers? |
Peter365 (Peter365)
New member Username: Peter365
Post Number: 2484 Registered: 1-2007
| | Posted on Thursday, February 18, 2010 - 1:33 pm: |      |
Oh I've another idea brewing is the relevant country China? |
Torquemada (Torquemada)
New member Username: Torquemada
Post Number: 133 Registered: 1-2010
| | Posted on Thursday, February 18, 2010 - 2:39 pm: |      |
Could it be that the children lost their childhood innocence and therefore we no longer childlike? No We're they pressed into doing something like forced labour or prostitution? anything to do with Child soldiers? Nothing like this Oh I've another idea brewing is the relevant country China? Sorry, no |
Gourami (Gourami)
Moderator Username: Gourami
Post Number: 960 Registered: 10-2008
| | Posted on Thursday, February 18, 2010 - 2:43 pm: |      |
Were the guilty parties the parents? Other relatives of the children? Other children? Employees of the children's family? Strangers to the children and their family? Were they cheating the government out of money? Extorting? Blackmailing? Holding someone/something for ransom? Is a law about having children relevant? A law about childcare? |
Torquemada (Torquemada)
New member Username: Torquemada
Post Number: 135 Registered: 1-2010
| | Posted on Thursday, February 18, 2010 - 3:14 pm: |      |
Were the guilty parties the parents? Yes Other relatives of the children? Other children? Employees of the children's family? Strangers to the children and their family? None of these Were they cheating the government out of money? Yes Extorting? Blackmailing? Holding someone/something for ransom? None of these Is a law about having children relevant? Could you rephrase please A law about childcare? No |
Peter365 (Peter365)
New member Username: Peter365
Post Number: 2485 Registered: 1-2007
| | Posted on Thursday, February 18, 2010 - 11:24 pm: |      |
Were the parents making false Child Allowance claims? |
Peter365 (Peter365)
New member Username: Peter365
Post Number: 2486 Registered: 1-2007
| | Posted on Thursday, February 18, 2010 - 11:25 pm: |      |
oh and when the government did a full audit they uncovered bogus claims in respect of 7 million non-existant children? |
Torquemada (Torquemada)
New member Username: Torquemada
Post Number: 136 Registered: 1-2010
| | Posted on Friday, February 19, 2010 - 7:15 pm: |      |
Were the parents making false Child Allowance claims? No, but you're very much OTRT oh and when the government did a full audit they uncovered bogus claims in respect of 7 million non-existant children? There was no audit, no direct evidence that any particular person had committed fraud (at least not without further investigation), and about half of the children subsequently turned up, but despite all that, you're getting very close. |
Peter365 (Peter365)
New member Username: Peter365
Post Number: 2487 Registered: 1-2007
| | Posted on Sunday, February 21, 2010 - 1:01 am: |      |
Tax returns relevant? |
Alhucema (Alhucema)
New member Username: Alhucema
Post Number: 1783 Registered: 11-2008
| | Posted on Sunday, February 21, 2010 - 9:13 am: |      |
Did all the "children" belong to the same group in the aspects relevant to this puzzle? You answered "yope" to the question whether they were alive - does it mean some of them are and some of them are not? |
Torquemada (Torquemada)
New member Username: Torquemada
Post Number: 137 Registered: 1-2010
| | Posted on Sunday, February 21, 2010 - 6:49 pm: |      |
Tax returns relevant? Yes! Now we're cooking with gas Did all the "children" belong to the same group in the aspects relevant to this puzzle? The same group, but in two parts. They all disappeared at the same time and in the same way, but some turned up in due course, and some didn't You answered "yope" to the question whether they were alive - does it mean some of them are and some of them are not? Yes, indeed |
Peter365 (Peter365)
New member Username: Peter365
Post Number: 2489 Registered: 1-2007
| | Posted on Sunday, February 21, 2010 - 8:26 pm: |      |
Hmm Did this happen in the US? Was there a relevant date ? I don't know what date Americans have to file their taxes , is it that date? Was some law or rule changed regarding tax treatment of dependants? The "some" that turned up would they be more than half of the 7 million less than half, about a half? Oh I know did the IRS suddenly make a new rule whereby children or dependants included in tax returns had to be verified by some relevant documentation? A birth cert for example and let's say only about 50% were actually able to prove that the child existed and by inference the rest were bogus? |
Torquemada (Torquemada)
New member Username: Torquemada
Post Number: 138 Registered: 1-2010
| | Posted on Monday, February 22, 2010 - 8:59 am: |      |
Hmm Did this happen in the US? Yes, it did Was there a relevant date ? There was I don't know what date Americans have to file their taxes , is it that date? Spot on Was some law or rule changed regarding tax treatment of dependants? Again, absolutely right The "some" that turned up would they be more than half of the 7 million less than half, about a half? About half Oh I know did the IRS suddenly make a new rule whereby children or dependants included in tax returns had to be verified by some relevant documentation? Yes, pretty much A birth cert for example and let's say only about 50% were actually able to prove that the child existed and by inference the rest were bogus? That's about it, which is enough for a *******SPOILER******** This is the story, made famous by Freakonomics, of the night of 15th April 1987, when tax returns filed in the US contained claims for 7m fewer dependents than the previous year, as a result of changes to require the Social Security numbers of all dependents claimed in tax returns. Snopes has the full story at http://www.snopes.com/business/taxes/dependents.asp. I was going to base the puzzle on the the bare facts as reported in Freakonomics, but when I investigated to find corroboration for the story, I discovered evidence to confirm what I had suspected, that the figure of 7m was an exaggeration of the number of fraudulent claims. From various sources, I discovered that 2m children reappeared the following year, when parents had had time to correct their error in not obtaining SS numbers for their children, and over time, the number of "true" disappearances probably went down to around 3m. My nerdy insistence on getting the facts right meant that I couldn't bring myself to ignore the returned children. Combined with the fact that the disappearances occurred on paper, this meant quite a big lateral leap was needed before anything started to make sense. In hindsight, it might have been better to force myself to concentrate on the non-existent children, but that was such an efficient "puzzkill" towards the end that it might have been over all too quickly without that leap. Well done everyone |
Peter365 (Peter365)
New member Username: Peter365
Post Number: 2495 Registered: 1-2007
| | Posted on Monday, February 22, 2010 - 1:00 pm: |      |
Nice puzzle Torquemada. |