| Author | Message | ||
| John Morahan (Wunderland)
|
Was the seller an individual? a corporation? a government? a government organization? a nonprofit? another organization? another group of individuals? Were they trying to raise their profile generally? attract attention to something they were doing? | ||
| Birgitta Ericsson (Brid)
|
By John Morahan (Wunderland) on Wednesday, May 11, 2005 - 04:36 pm: Was the seller an individual? a corporation? a government? a government organization? a nonprofit? another organization? another group of individuals? a shop (chain of shops) Were they trying to raise their profile generally? probably attract attention to something they were doing? | ||
| John Morahan (Wunderland)
|
Is the item made of: wood? metal? plastic? ceramics? glass? Is it electric? electronic? does it have any moving parts? Is it smaller than: a button? an orange? a television? | ||
| Birgitta Ericsson (Brid)
|
By John Morahan (Wunderland) on Thursday, May 12, 2005 - 08:01 pm: Is the item made of: wood? no metal? partly plastic? partly, possibly ceramics? no glass? partly, possibly Is it electric? no electronic? no does it have any moving parts? please define "moving parts" Is it smaller than: a button? no an orange? in some directions a television? yes | ||
| John Morahan (Wunderland)
|
Is it something other than a single solid object with an exact fixed shape? does it have solid parts which normally move relative to one another? does its shape change smoothly like a sponge? does it have any liquid parts? or gaseous parts? is the whole thing intended to move by itself? does it have anything else which might reasonably be considered a "moving part"? Is it flat? round? square? rectangular? triangular? polygonal? irregulary shaped? or is it long and thin? | ||
| Birgitta Ericsson (Brid)
|
By John Morahan (Wunderland) on Friday, May 13, 2005 - 02:33 pm: Is it something other than a single solid object with an exact fixed shape? no-ish does it have solid parts which normally move relative to one another? yes does its shape change smoothly like a sponge? does it have any liquid parts? or gaseous parts? is the whole thing intended to move by itself? does it have anything else which might reasonably be considered a "moving part"? no to rest Is it flat? parts are round? parts may be square? parts may be rectangular? parts may be triangular? parts usually are not polygonal? parts usually are not irregulary shaped? not exactly, but it's not a very simple shape or is it long and thin? parts are | ||
| HotBod (Hotbod)
|
Telephone? Mobile? | ||
| John Morahan (Wunderland)
|
Is it mostly made of: metal? plastic? glass? something else? Are the plastic parts clear plastic? Is it a container of any sort? if so, is the container itself valuable? or just its contents? Is it a box with a lid? | ||
| Birgitta Ericsson (Brid)
|
By HotBod (Hotbod) on Friday, May 20, 2005 - 07:40 pm: Telephone? Mobile? no to both By John Morahan (Wunderland) on Sunday, May 22, 2005 - 07:40 pm: Is it mostly made of: metal? plastic? glass? metal and plastic or metal and glass or plastic and glass with metal details or plastic with metal details something else? Are the plastic parts clear plastic? in certain cases yes, otherwise maybe Is it a container of any sort? no if so, is the container itself valuable? or just its contents? Is it a box with a lid? no | ||
| John Morahan (Wunderland)
|
Is it functional? decorative? is it normally used for entertainment? is it normally used in conjunction with something else? Is it fixed in one place? would it normally be moved frequently? Was it initially the seller's property? Did someone give some money to the seller? Did it then become that person's property? | ||
| John Morahan (Wunderland)
|
Is it a pair of glasses? or sunglasses? with designer frames? | ||
| Dan Schmiedeler (Instereo)
|
Was there a misunderstanding on the woman's part regarding the physical dimensions of item? Was the actual item much smaller than what the woman was thinking it was going to be? | ||
| Birgitta Ericsson (Brid)
|
By John Morahan (Wunderland) on Wednesday, May 25, 2005 - 06:20 pm: Is it functional? decorative? is it normally used for entertainment? is it normally used in conjunction with something else? Is it fixed in one place? would it normally be moved frequently? see below Was it initially the seller's property? yes Did someone give some money to the seller? not in this case, because... Did it then become that person's property? would have been By John Morahan (Wunderland) on Wednesday, May 25, 2005 - 07:40 pm: Is it a pair of glasses? YES! or sunglasses? no with designer frames? no By Dan Schmiedeler (Instereo) on Wednesday, May 25, 2005 - 08:10 pm: Was there a misunderstanding on the woman's part regarding the physical dimensions of item? Was the actual item much smaller than what the woman was thinking it was going to be? no RECAP: One woman (whom I know well) should have had the opportunity of her lifetime to get a pair of glasses much cheaper than normally. It didn't work out, however, because of circumstances yet to be established. This could apply to other people as well, some of whom might well have used the opportunity to their advantage. | ||
| HotBod (Hotbod)
|
Was it some kind of an exchange scheme where old glasses were to be exchanged for new ones? And she didnt have the old ones? Or was the discount based on the power of the glasses? And hers was low? Did the customers have to fulfil some qualifying condition to be eligible for the offer? Did the customers have to do some action before being eligible? | ||
| Birgitta Ericsson (Brid)
|
By HotBod (Hotbod) on Thursday, May 26, 2005 - 07:45 am: Was it some kind of an exchange scheme where old glasses were to be exchanged for new ones? no And she didnt have the old ones? Or was the discount based on the power of the glasses? no And hers was low? Did the customers have to fulfil some qualifying condition to be eligible for the offer? yesish Did the customers have to do some action before being eligible? no | ||
| Dref (Dref)
|
Is measuring of vision relevant? | ||
| Birgitta Ericsson (Brid)
|
By Dref (Dref) on Thursday, May 26, 2005 - 08:30 pm: Is measuring of vision relevant? not more than in any purchase of glasses | ||
| Dref (Dref)
|
Is returns policy relevant? | ||
| John Morahan (Wunderland)
|
Was the offer made by an optician? Was the offer made to a specific customer? eg the millionth customer? or the first customer? Did the offer apply to a specific pair of glasses? if so, would they have been unsuitable for her? | ||
| Birgitta Ericsson (Brid)
|
By Dref (Dref) on Friday, May 27, 2005 - 05:36 pm: Is returns policy relevant? yes By John Morahan (Wunderland) on Saturday, May 28, 2005 - 01:32 am: Was the offer made by an optician? yes, or a chain of opticians Was the offer made to a specific customer? noish eg the millionth customer? or the first customer? no to these Did the offer apply to a specific pair of glasses? no, any glasses if so, would they have been unsuitable for her? | ||
| Dref (Dref)
|
Would she have benefited by saying her glasses were unsatisfactory? | ||
| John Morahan (Wunderland)
|
Did she already have a pair of glasses? did she actually need a new pair? did she want one? Did the offer apply to a complete pair of glasses? just the frames? just the lenses? Could more than one person have availed of the offer? Could one person have availed of the offer more than once? |
