Archive through January 19, 2005

Log Out | Topics | Search Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Author Message Mezzoforte (Mezzoforte) Posted on Saturday, November 13, 2004 - 2:36 am:        Chemical reaction relevant then? Birgitta Ericsson (Brid) Posted on Wednesday, November 17, 2004 - 6:31 am:        By Mezzoforte (Mezzoforte) on Saturday, November 13, 2004 - 02:36 am: Chemical reaction relevant then? not very, actually. Hint: Think language. Mezzoforte (Mezzoforte) Posted on Friday, November 26, 2004 - 2:10 am:        Was it a bad translation? Birgitta Ericsson (Brid) Posted on Friday, November 26, 2004 - 6:35 am:        By Mezzoforte (Mezzoforte) on Friday, November 26, 2004 - 02:10 am: Was it a bad translation? no, but OTRT Mezzoforte (Mezzoforte) Posted on Thursday, December 02, 2004 - 3:03 am:        Bad transcription? Birgitta Ericsson (Brid) Posted on Friday, December 03, 2004 - 6:43 am:        By Mezzoforte (Mezzoforte) on Thursday, December 02, 2004 - 03:03 am: Bad transcription? this is closer, but not on the spot Mezzoforte (Mezzoforte) Posted on Friday, December 03, 2004 - 12:35 pm:        Bad rounding? Birgitta Ericsson (Brid) Posted on Tuesday, December 07, 2004 - 6:41 am:        By Mezzoforte (Mezzoforte) on Friday, December 03, 2004 - 12:35 pm: Bad rounding? this is even closer Mezzoforte (Mezzoforte) Posted on Tuesday, December 07, 2004 - 4:24 pm:        Bad usage of significant figures? Birgitta Ericsson (Brid) Posted on Wednesday, December 08, 2004 - 6:42 am:        By Mezzoforte (Mezzoforte) on Tuesday, December 07, 2004 - 04:24 pm: Bad usage of significant figures? not sure what you mean here, but it still seems close David Burn (Woubit) Posted on Wednesday, December 08, 2004 - 6:46 am:        Bad interpretation of the word "least"? Birgitta Ericsson (Brid) Posted on Wednesday, December 08, 2004 - 7:40 am:        By David Burn (Woubit) on Wednesday, December 08, 2004 - 06:46 am: Bad interpretation of the word "least"? no Mezzoforte (Mezzoforte) Posted on Saturday, December 11, 2004 - 2:33 am:        Bad instrument used? Birgitta Ericsson (Brid) Posted on Tuesday, December 14, 2004 - 6:49 am:        By Mezzoforte (Mezzoforte) on Saturday, December 11, 2004 - 02:33 am: Bad instrument used? no Mezzoforte (Mezzoforte) Posted on Tuesday, December 14, 2004 - 8:45 pm:        Inaccurate device used before? Birgitta Ericsson (Brid) Posted on Wednesday, December 15, 2004 - 7:50 am:        By Mezzoforte (Mezzoforte) on Tuesday, December 14, 2004 - 08:45 pm: Inaccurate device used before? not so much inaccurate device used as process used inaccurately Mezzoforte (Mezzoforte) Posted on Friday, December 17, 2004 - 12:48 am:        So whoever wrote this thing down knew that there was a flaw in the process, so they had to compensate somehow? Birgitta Ericsson (Brid) Posted on Friday, December 17, 2004 - 6:49 am:        By Mezzoforte (Mezzoforte) on Friday, December 17, 2004 - 12:48 am: So whoever wrote this thing down knew that there was a flaw in the process, so they had to compensate somehow? Hmm. Whoever wrote this thing down knew that there was a flaw in the process. Someone else did something else. Tommy Petersson (Tommyp) Posted on Wednesday, December 29, 2004 - 6:52 pm:        Measuring problem involved? any problem with using dot instead of comma? (or vice versa) Birgitta Ericsson (Brid) Posted on Tuesday, January 04, 2005 - 8:07 am:        By Tommy Petersson (Tommyp) on Wednesday, December 29, 2004 - 06:52 pm: Measuring problem involved? no, but OTRT any problem with using dot instead of comma? (or vice versa) no Amol D. (Amol) Posted on Friday, January 14, 2005 - 10:22 am:        Is subtraction involved ? Denise Cameron (Dencam) Posted on Wednesday, January 19, 2005 - 3:03 am:        Hello. I am a newbie. Hope you don't mind if I join in. Do the two people involved know each other? Do they interact with each other? Does one make a mistake? And the other tries to compensate for the mistake? Can any one (or two) adult person/people mix this compound?