| Author | Message | ||
| keith davies (Keithdavies175)
|
was it carried out by a famous scientist ? Were there any birds involved ? were any animals hurt ? killed ? was the amount of animals relevant ? is the place where the experiment carried out of interest ? | ||
| Kapil Kapur (Dinkie)
|
was something dropped from a great height and impacted the ground - leaving a strange mark ? was in Europe ? Italy ??? | ||
| Fred Z (Dref)
|
By keith davies (Keithdavies175) on Friday, April 01, 2005 - 08:24 am: was it carried out by a famous scientist ? yes Were there any birds involved ? yes were any animals hurt ? killed ? yes was the amount of animals relevant ? yes is the place where the experiment carried out of interest ? no, but... By Kapil Kapur (Dinkie) on Friday, April 01, 2005 - 01:10 pm: was something dropped from a great height and impacted the ground - leaving a strange mark ? no was in Europe ? yes Italy ??? but no | ||
| keith davies (Keithdavies175)
|
uk ? france ? germany ? spain ? Was the scientist a national of this country ? Is the type of bird relevant ? how many birds 2 ? less than 10 ? all of same type ? pigeons involved ? did he intend to kill any birds ? | ||
| Fred Z (Dref)
|
uk ? this france ? germany ? spain ? Was the scientist a national of this country ? yes Is the type of bird relevant ? yes how many birds 2 ? less than 10 ? all of same type ? Just one bird. pigeons involved ? no did he intend to kill any birds ? yes | ||
| keith davies (Keithdavies175)
|
was it a domestic bird ? bird of prey ? larger than a chicken ? did the bird die from a fall ? | ||
| Fred Z (Dref)
|
was it a domestic bird ? yes bird of prey ? no larger than a chicken ? no did the bird die from a fall ? no | ||
| keith davies (Keithdavies175)
|
was it a magpie ? crow ? finch ? tit ? parrot budgie ? cause of death, was it starved ? squashed ? gased ? exploded ? other ? | ||
| Fred Z (Dref)
|
was it a magpie ? crow ? finch ? tit ? parrot budgie ? none of these cause of death, was it starved ? squashed ? gased ? exploded ? other ? other, cause is not actually relevant though, just that it was dead | ||
| keith davies (Keithdavies175)
|
did the bird die before, during or after the experiment ? was the bird bigger than a magpie ? | ||
| Fred Z (Dref)
|
did the bird die before, during or after the experiment ? Before, it was killed in order to do the experiment. was the bird bigger than a magpie ? yes | ||
| Badger Bristle (Nagrom)
|
does this have anything to do with the ex-parrot sketch? That'd be great if it did... The mark; you said it was not a physical mark, correct? If so, then was it a conceptual impression left- something that would effect others? Is this a fairly well known experiment? Was the experiment conducted in the 1800s? Is the time period relevant because of what was occuring during this era? What technology was available? What the people believed in? Was the bird the main 'ingrediant' in the experiment? Was the bird a crucial element? Was the experiment an attempt to create something helpful to other people? Helpful only to himself/herself? Helpful at all? The scientist: Their age relevant? Any personal information at all? Their location within the uk? | ||
| Fred Z (Dref)
|
does this have anything to do with the ex-parrot sketch? That'd be great if it did... nope, but hello, long time no C The mark; you said it was not a physical mark, correct? yes If so, then was it a conceptual impression left- something that would effect others? nope Is this a fairly well known experiment? no Was the experiment conducted in the 1800s? noIs the time period relevant because of what was occuring during this era? no What technology was available? noish What the people believed in? no Was the bird the main 'ingrediant' in the experiment? no Was the bird a crucial element? yes Was the experiment an attempt to create something helpful to other people? no Helpful only to himself/herself? no Helpful at all? no The scientist: Their age relevant? no Any personal information at all? no Their location within the uk? no | ||
| Badger Bristle (Nagrom)
|
well that shot me down Did the scientist do anything to the bird post mordum? (sp?) Before he killed it? Did he or anyone else eat part of the bird? Was it a chicken? Turkey? Anything like that? Was anything wrong with the bird before it died? Did he buy the bird for the experiment? Relevant how he came to have the bird? Would any other kind of bird have worked for the initial experiment? Did the bird do anything to the scientist before it died? | ||
| Badger Bristle (Nagrom)
|
16th century possibly? | ||
| Fred Z (Dref)
|
well that shot me down Well, you did have one yes in there. ;) Did the scientist do anything to the bird post mordum? (sp?) yes Before he killed it? no Did he or anyone else eat part of the bird? no, but... Was it a chicken? yes Turkey? Anything like that? Was anything wrong with the bird before it died? no Did he buy the bird for the experiment? yes Relevant how he came to have the bird? no Would any other kind of bird have worked for the initial experiment? yes Did the bird do anything to the scientist before it died? no | ||
| Fred Z (Dref)
|
16th century possibly? no, just a bit off | ||
| Badger Bristle (Nagrom)
|
was there a particular reason he picked a chicken for the experiment? did you say he killed it himself? Did he pull it's feathers out, skin it, that traditional thing? Did he have to do anything to the bird in order for the experiment to work? Did it have anything to do with cooking? Before the 16th century? After? 17th? 18th? 19th? | ||
| Fred Z (Dref)
|
was there a particular reason he picked a chicken for the experiment? no did you say he killed it himself? nah, but that aspect is irrel Did he pull it's feathers out, skin it, that traditional thing? yes Did he have to do anything to the bird in order for the experiment to work? yes Did it have anything to do with cooking? noish Before the 16th century? After? 17th? this 18th? 19th? | ||
| Kapil Kapur (Dinkie)
|
you mentioned it wasn't really cooking ... so did he perform the experiment on the dead chicken .... and it didn't turn out as expected but the TASTE was unexpectedly good ??? | ||
| Fred Z (Dref)
|
you mentioned it wasn't really cooking correct... so did he perform the experiment on the dead chicken yes .... and it didn't turn out as expected but the TASTE was unexpectedly good ??? no, sorry, it was something much more outlandish than that! ;) | ||
| Barbara Johannessen Bailey (Rabrab)
|
No-ish to cooking; was it preservation? preparation for cooking? for eating? Something's niggling at the back of my brain but it won't come out where I can see it  |
