| Author |
Message |
Lisa (Dlcygnet)
| | Posted on Monday, March 20, 2006 - 5:06 pm: |      |
It's been awhile since I tried posting, so here goes. True story: Amazingly, there has only been one case of this ever happening. And the incident was faked! |
Lynne (Lynne)
| | Posted on Monday, March 20, 2006 - 5:11 pm: |      |
'Proof' of fairies at the bottom of the garden? |
Lisa (Dlcygnet)
| | Posted on Monday, March 20, 2006 - 5:57 pm: |      |
'Proof' of fairies at the bottom of the garden? No. I saw that movie, though. |
B. Johnson (Sycorax)
| | Posted on Monday, March 20, 2006 - 6:10 pm: |      |
"the incident"="this"? |
Lisa (Dlcygnet)
| | Posted on Monday, March 20, 2006 - 6:13 pm: |      |
"the incident"="this"? Yes. |
B. Johnson (Sycorax)
| | Posted on Monday, March 20, 2006 - 6:38 pm: |      |
So, in fact, there has never been a real case of "this" happening? |
Lisa (Dlcygnet)
| | Posted on Monday, March 20, 2006 - 6:44 pm: |      |
So, in fact, there has never been a real case of "this" happening? Correct. It happened, but it was staged. |
Simon Downham (Beroean)
| | Posted on Monday, March 20, 2006 - 11:47 pm: |      |
Landing on the moon? Moon Walking? A human endeavor? An incident in nature? Something supernatural? |
Lisa (Dlcygnet)
| | Posted on Tuesday, March 21, 2006 - 1:00 am: |      |
Landing on the moon? No. Moon Walking? No. A human endeavor? No. An incident in nature? No. Something supernatural? No. |
Simon Downham (Beroean)
| | Posted on Tuesday, March 21, 2006 - 8:29 am: |      |
Was the faking done by a person / persons? Did the incident actually involve a person or persons? |
Lisa (Dlcygnet)
| | Posted on Tuesday, March 21, 2006 - 5:20 pm: |      |
Was the faking done by a person / persons? Yope. Did the incident actually involve a person or persons? No. |
Warwick Bassett (Lemon_Martini)
| | Posted on Tuesday, March 21, 2006 - 9:19 pm: |      |
Immortality involved? Some sort of life after death? |
Lisa (Dlcygnet)
| | Posted on Tuesday, March 21, 2006 - 9:40 pm: |      |
Immortality involved? No. Some sort of life after death? No. |
Simon Downham (Beroean)
| | Posted on Tuesday, March 21, 2006 - 10:29 pm: |      |
are any of these involved: Animals? Illusions? Astronomy? Weather? Cartoons? Works of fiction? Art? |
Lisa (Dlcygnet)
| | Posted on Tuesday, March 21, 2006 - 10:43 pm: |      |
are any of these involved: Animals? No. Illusions? No. Unless you count the video they made of this hoax. It was live video though, no editing. Astronomy? No. Weather? No. Cartoons? No. Works of fiction? Yope. Art? No. |
Simon Downham (Beroean)
| | Posted on Tuesday, March 21, 2006 - 11:27 pm: |      |
So it was an illusion in the sense that the video appeared to show something that did not occur? Did something invisible apparantly become visible? Is the video famous? Am I likely to have seen it? Commercial video? Were people in the video? Did the video take place underwater? On land? In the air? in space? underground? In a building? |
Lisa (Dlcygnet)
| | Posted on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 - 12:33 am: |      |
So it was an illusion in the sense that the video appeared to show something that did not occur? Yeah. They MADE something happen and video taped this staged occurance. So anybody watching the video would think it had really happened. Did something invisible apparantly become visible? No. Is the video famous? No. I haven't even seen it and it's my field. Am I likely to have seen it? No. Commercial video? No. Were people in the video? Don't know. Irrel. Did the video take place underwater? No. On land? Yes. In the air? No. in space? No. underground? Doubtful. In a building? Yes. |
Ixoye724 (Ixoye724)
| | Posted on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 - 3:13 pm: |      |
Did the video portray any of the following... use of weapons? a dangerous accident? destruction of property? theft (Ocean's 11 comes to mind)? a discovery? |
Lisa (Dlcygnet)
| | Posted on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 - 3:39 pm: |      |
Did the video portray any of the following... use of weapons? No. a dangerous accident? Kindof. destruction of property? Probably. theft (Ocean's 11 comes to mind)? No. a discovery? Only in terms of shock... "Woah, they can do that?", but not some scientific thing. |
Christiane Scharf (0815)
| | Posted on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 - 4:04 pm: |      |
Was the video made in this decade? the 1990s? the 1980s? the 1970s? the 1960s? the 1950s? earlier? Did it feature some up-to-date technology of the time when it was made? Was it made by a government agency? Was it supposed to look like it was made by a government agency? |
Lisa (Dlcygnet)
| | Posted on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 - 9:23 pm: |      |
Was the video made in this decade? the 1990s? the 1980s? the 1970s? the 1960s? the 1950s? earlier? 90s or later Did it feature some up-to-date technology of the time when it was made? Yes. Was it made by a government agency? No. Was it supposed to look like it was made by a government agency? Doubtful. |
Christiane Scharf (0815)
| | Posted on Thursday, March 23, 2006 - 9:48 am: |      |
Did the video feature technology everybody you can buy at a shop? Military technology? Satellite technology? GPS? Nuclear technology? Biotech? Viruses? something with DNA? genetic engineering? |