| Author |
Message |
Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd)
New member Username: Judgedeadd
Post Number: 84 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Sunday, October 01, 2006 - 6:06 am: |      |
Sarah was furious and destroyed it. Later she regretted it. |
Erik (Erik)
New member Username: Erik
Post Number: 34 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Sunday, October 01, 2006 - 7:39 am: |      |
SARAH: human? Between 0-5 yrs old? 6-12? teenager? 20 and above? IT: a tangible object? a toy? food? vehicle? furniture? object made of glass? made of plastic? made of metal? wood? paper? an idea? |
Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd)
New member Username: Judgedeadd
Post Number: 85 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Sunday, October 01, 2006 - 7:54 am: |      |
SARAH: human? Yes Between 0-5 yrs old? 6-12? teenager? 20 and above? This one IT: a tangible object? Yes a toy? food? vehicle? furniture? None of these object made of glass? made of plastic? made of metal? wood? paper? Paper an idea?No |
Tobasi (Tobasi)
New member Username: Tobasi
Post Number: 136 Registered: 8-2006
| | Posted on Sunday, October 01, 2006 - 10:04 am: |      |
Was the object made of printed paper? a book? Was there something written by hand on the paper? Was it made only of paper or of several materials? cardboard? Was it longer than 1 mm? 10 mm? 100 mm? 1 m? 10 m? 100 m? 1 km? Did it belong to her? Is Sarahs occupation relevant? Are there other persons envolved? If yes 1? 2? ... Is the place relevant? the era? the time it took? |
Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd)
New member Username: Judgedeadd
Post Number: 86 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Sunday, October 01, 2006 - 10:09 am: |      |
Was the object made of printed paper? Yesish a book? No Was there something written by hand on the paper? No Was it made only of paper or of several materials? cardboard? Paper only Was it longer than 1 mm? 10 mm? 100 mm? 1 m? 10 m? 100 m? 1 km?About 100 mm Did it belong to her? Yope Is Sarahs occupation relevant? No Are there other persons envolved? If yes 1? 2? ... One other person Is the place relevant? Noish the era? Yope the time it took? Yope |
Tobasi (Tobasi)
New member Username: Tobasi
Post Number: 138 Registered: 8-2006
| | Posted on Sunday, October 01, 2006 - 10:38 am: |      |
Is there paint/ink on the object? Are there pictures on the object? or text? A photo? Is the paper folded? Is the object made of one sheet of paper? Would you find the object typically in a household? Did the object change the owner? The other person: human? female? adult? A family member? friend? colleague? of Sarah? Did the other person make her fourious? Did it happen before 1900? 1950? 1960? ... 2010? Is it a true story? could it really happen? She regretted it later, was that: seconds? minutes? hours? days? months? years? decades? later? is this relevant? |
Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd)
New member Username: Judgedeadd
Post Number: 90 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Sunday, October 01, 2006 - 10:42 am: |      |
Is there paint/ink on the object? Noish Are there pictures on the object? or text? No to both A photo? Yes, a photo Is the paper folded? Yesish Is the object made of one sheet of paper? Noish Would you find the object typically in a household? Yope Did the object change the owner? Yope The other person: human? female? adult? Human, male, adult A family member? Yope friend? colleague? of Sarah? No to rest Did the other person make her fourious? Yes Did it happen before 1900? 1950? 1960? ... 2010? Irrevelant, actually. But it happened in the twentieth century Is it a true story? Irrevelant could it really happen? Yes She regretted it later, was that: seconds? minutes? hours? days? months? years? decades? later? is this relevant? Yes, about a minute |
Tobasi (Tobasi)
New member Username: Tobasi
Post Number: 141 Registered: 8-2006
| | Posted on Sunday, October 01, 2006 - 6:13 pm: |      |
Time for a theory: The second person is Sarah's husband? ex-husband? partner? ex-partner? He is on the photo? Is Sarah on the photo? Sarah destroys the object because the photo reminds her of something? She regrets it because she acted without thinking? because she destroyed more than she wanted to? Is the object a photo? or something including a photo? or photos? |
Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd)
New member Username: Judgedeadd
Post Number: 94 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Sunday, October 01, 2006 - 7:44 pm: |      |
Time for a theory: The second person is Sarah's husband? ex-husband? partner? ex-partner? Ex-husband He is on the photo? Yes Is Sarah on the photo? No Sarah destroys the object because the photo reminds her of something? Yes She regrets it because she acted without thinking? Yope because she destroyed more than she wanted to? Yes Is the object a photo? or something including a photo? or photos? It's a photo |
Beroean (Beroean)
Moderator Username: Beroean
Post Number: 950 Registered: 10-2001
| | Posted on Monday, October 02, 2006 - 12:15 am: |      |
Dzień Dobry/Dobry Wieczór Jacek, Jak się maz? Was there something (other than her ex-husband) in the photo that is important? Would the photo have lead to financial gain? |
Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd)
New member Username: Judgedeadd
Post Number: 96 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Monday, October 02, 2006 - 7:57 am: |      |
Dzień Dobry/Dobry Wieczór Jacek, Jak się maz? Quite nicely, thank you. Calkiem niezle, dzieki Was there something (other than her ex-husband) in the photo that is important? Yes Would the photo have lead to financial gain? Yes |
Erik (Erik)
New member Username: Erik
Post Number: 35 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Monday, October 02, 2006 - 8:07 am: |      |
Is there someone else on the photo with the ex-husband? Her new wife? Children? Family? Alone? Is her ex-husband smiling on the photo? serious? dead (as in picture of a crime scene)? relevant? Does this involve crime? theft? murder? adultery? Did Sarah tore the photograph then later regretted it because she destroyed an evidence? Am I on the right track? :D |
Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd)
New member Username: Judgedeadd
Post Number: 98 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Monday, October 02, 2006 - 9:48 am: |      |
Is there someone else on the photo with the ex-husband? Her new wife? Children? Family? Alone? Alone Is her ex-husband smiling on the photo? serious? dead (as in picture of a crime scene)? relevant? Irrevelant Does this involve crime? theft? murder? adultery? Nop Did Sarah tore the photograph then later regretted it because she destroyed an evidence? No Am I on the right track? :D No Was there something (other than her ex-husband) in the photo that is important? Yes Actually, I meant Yope |
0815 (0815)
New member Username: 0815
Post Number: 530 Registered: 3-2006
| | Posted on Monday, October 02, 2006 - 12:20 pm: |      |
Did the photo give her a hint where to find something valuable? The financial gain: a treasure? access to some bank account? shares? blackmail relevant? Was there something on the back of the photo? Was there something relevant in the photo on the person of her ex-husband? is his clothing relevant? Relevant where he looks? His surroundings relevant? |
Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd)
New member Username: Judgedeadd
Post Number: 100 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Monday, October 02, 2006 - 12:41 pm: |      |
Did the photo give her a hint where to find something valuable? No The financial gain: a treasure? access to some bank account? shares? blackmail relevant? No to all Was there something on the back of the photo? Yes Was there something relevant in the photo on the person of her ex-husband? is his clothing relevant? Relevant where he looks? His surroundings relevant? None |
0815 (0815)
New member Username: 0815
Post Number: 531 Registered: 3-2006
| | Posted on Monday, October 02, 2006 - 12:57 pm: |      |
Was the thing on the back of the photo a timestamp? a note? a code? Was it written by hand? |
Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd)
New member Username: Judgedeadd
Post Number: 104 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Monday, October 02, 2006 - 2:09 pm: |      |
Was the thing on the back of the photo a timestamp? a note? Noish a code? Was it written by hand? No to rest |
0815 (0815)
New member Username: 0815
Post Number: 537 Registered: 3-2006
| | Posted on Monday, October 02, 2006 - 2:16 pm: |      |
Was something printed on the back? Was there a drawing? symbol? picture? Was something glued onto the photo? Had the photo been sent as a postcard? |
Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd)
New member Username: Judgedeadd
Post Number: 112 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Monday, October 02, 2006 - 2:37 pm: |      |
Was something printed on the back? Was there a drawing? symbol? picture? No to all Was something glued onto the photo? Yes Had the photo been sent as a postcard? No |
0815 (0815)
New member Username: 0815
Post Number: 541 Registered: 3-2006
| | Posted on Monday, October 02, 2006 - 2:42 pm: |      |
A stamp? another photo? a sticker? a piece of paper? a ticket? |
Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd)
New member Username: Judgedeadd
Post Number: 114 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Monday, October 02, 2006 - 2:51 pm: |      |
A stamp? another photo? a sticker? a piece of paper? Yesish a ticket? |
0815 (0815)
New member Username: 0815
Post Number: 545 Registered: 3-2006
| | Posted on Monday, October 02, 2006 - 3:22 pm: |      |
Paper? Cardboard? Tissue? |
Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd)
New member Username: Judgedeadd
Post Number: 118 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Monday, October 02, 2006 - 3:42 pm: |      |
Paper? Cardboard? Tissue? Well, yope for all of those |
Plebeian (Plebeian)
New member Username: Plebeian
Post Number: 648 Registered: 7-2006
| | Posted on Monday, October 02, 2006 - 4:04 pm: |      |
Was some information contained on the yesish paper on the photo which was later needed by Sarah? Was something stuck to the front of the photo itself? |
Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd)
New member Username: Judgedeadd
Post Number: 124 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Monday, October 02, 2006 - 4:08 pm: |      |
Was some information contained on the yesish paper on the photo which was later needed by Sarah? Noish Was something stuck to the front of the photo itself? No |
Tobasi (Tobasi)
New member Username: Tobasi
Post Number: 148 Registered: 8-2006
| | Posted on Monday, October 02, 2006 - 7:41 pm: |      |
Is the way she destroyed it relevant? ripping? burning? Did she keep the remains? Could the photo have served as a proof? If she had still the photo she could get money from him? from someone else? from an organisation like an insurance? |
Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd)
New member Username: Judgedeadd
Post Number: 132 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Tuesday, October 03, 2006 - 7:58 am: |      |
Is the way she destroyed it relevant? ripping? burning? Irr Did she keep the remains? Irr Could the photo have served as a proof? No If she had still the photo she could get money from him? Yope from someone else? from an organisation like an insurance? No to rest |
Plebeian (Plebeian)
New member Username: Plebeian
Post Number: 663 Registered: 7-2006
| | Posted on Tuesday, October 03, 2006 - 1:10 pm: |      |
If she had ripped the photo up, just by, say, tearing it in two, would she be able to repair the photo to the point where she wouldn't have cause to regret it? Does she, in fact, regret the fact that she's destroyed the photo? Was she attempting to destroy only the part of the photo with her Ex on it? |
Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd)
New member Username: Judgedeadd
Post Number: 141 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Tuesday, October 03, 2006 - 1:16 pm: |      |
If she had ripped the photo up, just by, say, tearing it in two, would she be able to repair the photo to the point where she wouldn't have cause to regret it? Depends, but rather no. Careful, FA incoming! Does she, in fact, regret the fact that she's destroyed the photo? Yope Was she attempting to destroy only the part of the photo with her Ex on it? Yope |
Plebeian (Plebeian)
New member Username: Plebeian
Post Number: 678 Registered: 7-2006
| | Posted on Wednesday, October 04, 2006 - 11:57 am: |      |
(Sorry for possible upcoming repeats, but I need a clearer image of this photo, so to speak The thing that Sarah destroyed was a photograph, correct? This photograph was printed on paper, correct? (photographic paper or plain paper?) This photograph had her ex-husband in it, true? Was she also in the photo? Any other relevant people in the photo? A passport-sized photo? An 8x10" portrait size? Bigger? Much bigger? And there was something glued to the photo, true? ...Hang on - Stamp sized?? |
Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd)
New member Username: Judgedeadd
Post Number: 154 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Wednesday, October 04, 2006 - 1:41 pm: |      |
(Sorry for possible upcoming repeats, but I need a clearer image of this photo, so to speak The thing that Sarah destroyed was a photograph, correct? Yes This photograph was printed on paper, correct? Yes (photographic paper or plain paper?) Irr This photograph had her ex-husband in it, true? Irr Was she also in the photo? Irr Any other relevant people in the photo? Irr A passport-sized photo? An 8x10" portrait size? Bigger? Much bigger? Hmm... I think the photo was about 100 mm long and 50 mm wide. And there was something glued to the photo, true? Yes ...Hang on - Stamp sized?? No |
Plebeian (Plebeian)
New member Username: Plebeian
Post Number: 684 Registered: 7-2006
| | Posted on Wednesday, October 04, 2006 - 2:16 pm: |      |
shucks, thought I was on to something But (relevant or not) her ex-husband was in the photograph? And it was her ex-husband who made her furious? And in her fury she destroyed the photograph? And something was glued to the back of the photo? Was her regret that she'd destroyed the other thing? Was she aware at the time of destroying the photo that something was glued to the back? Was it something of monetary value? |
Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd)
New member Username: Judgedeadd
Post Number: 157 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Wednesday, October 04, 2006 - 6:49 pm: |      |
But (relevant or not) her ex-husband was in the photograph? Maybe, I don't know And it was her ex-husband who made her furious? Yes And in her fury she destroyed the photograph? Yes And something was glued to the back of the photo? Yes Was her regret that she'd destroyed the other thing? Yes Was she aware at the time of destroying the photo that something was glued to the back? No Was it something of monetary value? Yes |
Tobasi (Tobasi)
New member Username: Tobasi
Post Number: 157 Registered: 8-2006
| | Posted on Wednesday, October 04, 2006 - 9:51 pm: |      |
The thing glued to the photo: Is the value relevant? more than $1? $10? $100? A stamp? Was it as big as the photo? More than 1 cm? 2 cm? 9 cm long? |
Beroean (Beroean)
Moderator Username: Beroean
Post Number: 960 Registered: 10-2001
| | Posted on Thursday, October 05, 2006 - 8:55 am: |      |
Dzień dobry Jacek Was it something that was of direct value such as a £50 note? Or was it something that could have been converted into money such as a valuable postage stamp? Or was it something that would have lead to money such as a map, instructions, a will? |
Plebeian (Plebeian)
New member Username: Plebeian
Post Number: 714 Registered: 7-2006
| | Posted on Friday, October 06, 2006 - 10:07 am: |      |
Posted on Sunday, October 01, 2006 - 7:44 pm: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ... The second person is Sarah's husband? ex-husband? partner? ex-partner? Ex-husband He is on the photo? Yes ?? Is it that the ex was on the photo rather than in it, as in standing on it? Is the thing glued to the photo larger than the photo itself? significantly larger? Or smaller? significantly smaller? |
Senorina_illuminata (Senorina_illuminata)
New member Username: Senorina_illuminata
Post Number: 79 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Friday, October 06, 2006 - 10:41 am: |      |
was it a lottery ticket? lotto numbers? bank account details? his will? |
Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd)
New member Username: Judgedeadd
Post Number: 163 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Friday, October 06, 2006 - 10:44 am: |      |
I couldn't answer because I couldn't connect to the forums yesterday Was it something that was of direct value such as a £50 note? Yes, a bank note. Or was it something that could have been converted into money such as a valuable postage stamp? No Or was it something that would have lead to money such as a map, instructions, a will? No Is it that the ex was on the photo rather than in it, as in standing on it? No Is the thing glued to the photo larger than the photo itself? significantly larger? Or smaller? significantly smaller? Smaller was it a lottery ticket? lotto numbers? bank account details? his will? None of these. See above Okay, you now know what was on the photo, I guess I can post the answer. I don't have time right now though. |
Judgedeadd (Judgedeadd)
New member Username: Judgedeadd
Post Number: 170 Registered: 9-2006
| | Posted on Friday, October 06, 2006 - 12:18 pm: |      |
***SPOILER*** Sarah received a letter from her ex-husband (who left her and moved to another country, with a different woman), with an enclosed photo of her ex. She furiously threw the photo into the fireplace and decided to read the letter. It said that ex-husband is sending Sarah 400$, taped to the back of the photo. Sarah's grief was indescribable. |