by Lynne » Fri Mar 01, 2019 1:21 pm
Galfisk
So sorry, I missed these
Relevant how Otto knows Kent ate a meat-only condiment? yes - the salesman told him that the police knew about it from the grocer
Does Kent know that Otto knows this? no
Does Kent know that someone knows this? no
Does Kent want people to believe he didn't eat any meat? Probably, he doesn't realise his big error with the condimentTo belive he is no longer a vegetarian? no Does he chop down the trees to make a point? Show a skill? no to both
Can Otto prove that Kent killed and ate Viola by coming up with forensic evidence? no, he just takes his thoughts to the police who investigate further By proving Kent's story false? yes By confronting Kent? no
If Kent had not chopped down the trees, would Otto be able to prove his guilt? no Would otto have been able to make the logical leap? he did make that leap
I think that everything has been found out about the condiment (it does have another generic name, but it makes no difference). I could spoil it now, but if you want to work out why he was chopping down his trees, then do continue.